DOJ refuses to help French authorities in criminal probe of X

Summary: The US Department of Justice is siding with X, as the social media platform owned by Elon Musk navigates a criminal investigation unfolding in France.

Background

As first described by The Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department characterized the French probe as "an effort to entangle the United States in a politically charged criminal proceeding aimed at wrongfully regulating through prosecution the business activities of a social media platform.” France launched its investigation into X in July, accusing the platform of manipulating its algorithm and "fraudulent information extraction." Months later, French authorities raided X's office in Paris and issued summonses to Musk and Linda Yaccarino, the former CEO of X, to appear for interviews on April 20 as part of the probe.

based on WSJ, French officials are also investigating X for other charges, including disseminating CSAM and Holocaust denial.

However, France's latest move to ask the Department of Justice for assistance has been stonewalled.

“This investigation seeks to use the criminal legal system in France to regulate a public square for the free expression of ideas and opinions in a manner contrary to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution," the DOJ wrote in letter, as seen by WSJ.

An xAI official told WSJ that it's "grateful to the Justice Department for rejecting this effort by a prosecutor in Paris to compel our CEO and several employees to sit for interviews." The firm spokesperson also noted there was "no wrongdoing" and that it was a "baseless investigation." This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/doj-refuses-to-help-french-authorities-in-criminal-probe-of-x-162654518.html?src=rss

Context

On the innovation side, research teams focus on efficiency gains, reliability, and measurable customer outcomes rather than headline metrics alone. Field feedback and production telemetry increasingly shape iteration cycles.

On the innovation side, research teams focus on efficiency gains, reliability, and measurable customer outcomes rather than headline metrics alone. Field feedback and production telemetry increasingly shape iteration cycles.

From a policy standpoint, jurisdictions differ on disclosure expectations, safety reviews, and cross-border data flows. Teams that document decisions and maintain audit trails tend to adapt more smoothly as rules evolve.

Investors and operators alike monitor macro conditions, interest-rate expectations, and regional demand when setting budgets. Even modest shifts in sentiment can affect hiring plans, R&D spend, and partnership activity across the stack.

From a policy standpoint, jurisdictions differ on disclosure expectations, safety reviews, and cross-border data flows. Teams that document decisions and maintain audit trails tend to adapt more smoothly as rules evolve.

Market participants continue to weigh supply dynamics, regulatory signals, and enterprise adoption when assessing near-term outcomes. Analyst commentary remains mixed, with emphasis on execution risk and timing of product rollouts.

Readers following this topic may also consult ongoing coverage from Reuters Technology and AP News Technology for additional primary reporting and market context.

Related coverage

2026's biggest crypto exploit: $292 million gets drained from Kelp DAO with wrapped ether stranded across 20 chains, ‘We keep our finances separate’: My boyfriend is in his 50s with no retirement savings — how worried should I be?